Видео

This is the only video I understood about Mendelow Matrix

Everything I learned in yesterday's 3 hour class that is mandatory attendance, I learned in this 13 minute video. Easy to feel like a pleb when this happens, and this happens a lot.

Capacity to contract..can you please elaborate?

I did not understand why their financial affairs won't be private. The 3rd disadvantage

That was really helpful

Who is watching in 2024. Love for them❤

Injunction

This Lecture is really educative, very precise and interesting. But the only concern is you did not talk about Implied waiver of the communication requirement in the case of a Unilateral contract. I am not sure, but I guess it’s probably because your focus is on Bilateral contracts

This actually makes sense now . Learnt more in 11 minutes than in one whole year at uni . Thank you so much for this content , very much appreciated 🎉

This video was educative

Lean production makes a buisness less rubust and flexible leading to things like the plague disaster a couple years ago have a much more devastating effect on the market than it otherwise would have. Easier to survive a famine if you have a little fat on you.

I love that people feel like common sense was just invented because someone came up with an acronym. Like "reducing waste is good" OH my gosh! Genius!

Awesome, thank you!

Make a video on collective agreements

Thank yo so much for this

we're watching this in class rn

The Pharmaceutical Society argued that placing the item in the bask was the acceptance. This was the artificial argument they created to mitigate the fact that a pharmacist was able to supervise transactions at the cash desk - thus meeting their duty under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act.

hi, may I know what if the party A agrees to transfer party B money, and party B said she will deliver the cake for party A once she make the payment. Then party A transfer party B money for the cake, and in this consideration what's case study that we can write about?

Double Decker buses - (direct to consumers because not sold in large quantities and consumers themselves are mostly transport companies or govt.) Washing Powder (wholesalers and retailers because large quantities and it isn't feasible to sell directly to millions of customers) Herbal remedies for dogs (I think, retailers suit here because the demand is low-intermediate. Note: I am assuming it's a food product. If this is a service then, directly to consumers is the best option)

Ethics cannot be based on popularity but law must be.

Morality is best understood as a personal understanding of best practices. Ethics is formalized and/or shared morality.

Bye bye nice stakeholder

Promisory estoppel please

It is a dangerous thing to confuse The Law for morality. That is to say, The Law only determines what is lawful and unlawful, not what is right and wrong. It is dangerous because, for example, as The Law of the 1950’s said gay sex was unlawful and therefore caused Alan Turing to choose castration over the potential of undergoing popular Hate Crimes in prison, the Law of tomorrow can create new situations in which other innocent people are castrated or persecuted.

Extremely helpful!

I need more help on criminal law , can anyone any other videos to help with my essay??

From the sounds of it still very helpful.

Right, I've tried to tried to DM you privately because I don't believe in public humiliation. However, at the start you said pacifically installed of specifically... I didnt hear the S and went back to check it defiantly was not in the audio.

Must consideration be the same amount as the offer ? For instance, I sell a bike to a friend for £100 but that friend can only pay me at the moment half of the price. Is there a contract that's enforceable in that case ? Thanks :)

Economies should be built to keep people going. People are not here to keep the economy going. People drive the economy. Not the other way around. Economies should be built by people for the people - In memory of JFK. ❤

Here we go again with the DL tasks🙂

Thanks it helps alot

Hey thank you, I never really understood this topic. Ty

very concise and useful👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩🧌

thank you!!

Is this American law

Just what I needed for my test tomorrow. Thank you!

In the first place partner parliament does not have supremacy over man. Man was given dominion by God in the Bible, evidenced by Genesis 1:26. Dominion being full control of the land, air, sea, And what creepeth up from below. In other words sovereignty was given to man, not just one man, but all man. Now, parliament only has supremacy over persons, which are legal fictions on paper only. Get your facts straight before you start teaching a bunch of shit. The facts are that I’ve been lied to my whole life., And now it’s time to call out the liars and the lies.

In the first place partner, parliament doesn’t have supremacy, the people were given dominion by God in genesis one 1:26. Dominion meaning full control of the land, air, and see, and what creepeth up from below. In other words sovereignty. What parliament has supremacy over is persons, which are legal fictions on paper, and not men and women.

Ur so boring

hey is there anyone who is studying Cambridge A2 law on 9084 , i really could use some notes to solve past papers.

Good video for my test today on law and morality...thanks mate, haha. 😅

we learn lean production without "minimising waste"

I will own a Franchise.

If you pay me I'll caption all of your videos so they aren't all ableist.

❤

Hey....enjoying it from Bangladesh. Take love❤️

THE LAW is only Legal 'IF... And ONLY' IF IT'S "MORAL".. Its so so so simple. There's only 10 commandments to follow, so just follow them !!!. All the small print and legal B. S was only written by another (most likely) man accoto his privelladged life experiences and the influence of his also privaledged friends that have up to now always been from the same club that they produced.!!!!. So all you do is follow Good morals.

Thank you for this.

Please I have a question If James owes John $2000. When pressed for payment James say “I would give u $500